Legalizing Euthanasia Debate – David Robertson (author of the Dawkins letters & Pastor of the Free Church of Scotland vs. Paul Badham, Prof. of University of Wales

A UK debate for assisted suicide, law that was patterned after Oregon states U.S.A but has not passed in Scotland. This 4 part debate is very instructive in right to life apologetics.

Debate is from 2009 – Two Christians (plus a handful of other officials) debate  in Scotland-  David Robertson who is  Pastor of the  historic St.Peter’s Free Church of Scotland in Dundee and Prof. Paul Badham -Professor of Theology and Religious Studies, Director of the Alistair Hardy Religious Experience Research Centre. As of May 17,2011 Scotland politicians are still fighting to pass assisted suicide legislation and are in great admiration of the Swiss for having passed the law already and for allowing foreigners to receive assisted suicide help there, as tourists.


Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Videourile Vodpod nu mai sunt disponibile.

1st collector for Legalizing Euthanasia Debate – David Robertson …
Follow my videos on vodpod

Theologians FOR Rev. David Robertson, Minister of St Peter’s Free Church of Dundee and author of The Dawkins Letters: challenging atheist myths AGAINST Professor Paul Badham, Professor of Theology and Religious Studies, Director of the Alistair Hardy Religious Experience Research Centre, patron of Dignity in Dying Chair Professor Martin Pippard, Professor of Haematology & Dean of Dundee Medical School. Background: In 2005, Jeremy Purvis MSP introduced a Private Members’ Bill into the Scottish Parliament, calling for a change in the law to allow Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) for those with a terminal illness. This attracted the support of six other MSPs. In January 2008 he tabled another motion calling for the legalization of PAS but could gain the support of only one other MSP. On 26 March 2008, Margo MacDonald, Independent MSP for Lothian, made an impassioned appeal for a change to the law on assisted dying. Ms MacDonald has Parkinson’s disease and ‘doesn’t want to burden any friend or doctor but wants to be able to end her life in case she has the worst form of Parkinson’s’. As a Christian, I have long been intrigued by how people’s belief frameworks give rise to their stance on a given issue. How do such frameworks hold up under scrutiny? Are they consistent with what the person perceives their framework to be? Are they internally and externally valid and reliable? What are the presuppositions and the logical outworkings? Since beginning my medical training this interest has inclined towards the application of these frameworks to patient care, and accordingly these questions have taken on an increased degree of importance. On this cerebral canvas, the move to legalize PAS in the United Kingdom was unlikely to escape my attention. The idea to do a debate on PAS was provoked following a long discussion with a colleague in February 2008. Our talk really opened my eyes to the immediacy of issue, the myths surrounding it and its implications for me as a Christian. Moreover, the reality that termination of life might become an accepted therapeutic option for people at the end of their life was personally disturbing. Accordingly, the impetus for organising such a large-scale debate was, firstly, that such an important subject which would have long-lasting and far-reaching implications for society deserved to be in the public sphere. Secondly, if PAS was legalized it would profoundly and permanently alter the practice of medicine in the UK. Would it be too much to say it would denature it? Thirdly, the subject deserved to be debated rigorously by experts from more than one discipline, so we had four speakers on each side of the house representing politics, medicine, ethics/law and theology. We sought to recruit the best speakers we could for each discipline. Fortunately, everyone we approached had experience of this issue before, with some even on the frontlines, and was delighted to participate (see above). Imperative to me, with such a sensitive and emotive subject, was to maintain the integrity of the event. I realised early on that I personally would be seen as being biased in my view on PAS, and this was subsequently pointed out to me by several ‘well-meaning’ supporters of PAS on the night of the debate, because I hold to a Christian worldview. But of course the belief that anyone is morally neutral is fallacious. Over 350 people attended and, contrary to what some have implied, they were of varying backgrounds and beliefs. The pre-debate vote showed that the overwhelming majority supported the motion. The post-debate vote was again overwhelmingly supportive of the motion. For a fuller account of the arguments presented readers are encouraged to watch the DVD recordings or are directed to Jack DW. A right to die? Monthly Record Magazine of the Free Church of Scotland; February 2009: pp.6-7. David W. Jack 18 November 2009 Disclaimer „This debate was organised by students from the Christian Medical Fellowship (CMF) student group at the University of Dundee Medical School. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of CMF or the University of Dundee. This debate was funded by: (i) anonymous donations (ii) group fundraising.”

From Church of Dundee – Motion: “This house believes that Physician Assisted Suicide should not be legalised in Scotland” 27 October 2008, Dalhousie Building, University of Dundee – Theologians

Moses – Filmul ‘Moise’ subtitrare in Limba Romana

In Limba Romana vezi aici-

Moise din Vechiul Testament. (Trei ore) ENGLEZA

 VIDEO by by seniorsam

Moise – Miracolul de la Marea Rosie-
S-a intimplat cu adevarat? (subtitrare)

VIDEO by mitnick2005

Moise – Cele 10 porunci – Table de la Dumnezeu?


Cele 10 Porunci (Engleza, film animat)

alternativa –

Blogosfera Evanghelică

Vizite unicate din Martie 6,2011

free counters

Va multumim ca ne-ati vizitat azi!

România – LIVE webcams de la orase mari