The evolution debate is shifting- Search for the historical Adam via Christianity Today Cover Story

The center of the evolution debate has shifted from asking whether we came from earlier animals to whether we could have come from one man and one woman.Richard N. Ostling | posted 6/03/2011 12:00AM Christianity Today

You can read the entire story here- All emphasis (bold type) is mine.

Secularist brows furrowed in 2009 when President Obama chose prominent atheist-turned-Christian Francis S. Collins to be the director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Under the Los Angeles Times headline „Fit to Head the NIH?,” Skeptic magazine’s Michael Shermer fretted that Collins’s beliefs might somehow corrupt America’s biggest biomedical research agency. In a New York Times piece, atheist Sam Harris was similarly „uncomfortable,” fearing in particular that a Collins administration might „seriously undercut” fields like neuroscience. Jerry Coyne, a University of Chicago expert on evolution, carped that the nominee’s „scary,” „bizarre,” „inane,” and „snake oil” ideas „pollute his science with his faith.”

Nonetheless, Collins won unanimous U.S. Senate confirmation, thanks to sterling achievements in biomedical research and leadership of NIH’s human genome research. Under Collins, this historic effort in 2003 finished mapping the complete sequence of several billion DNA subunits („bases”) and all of the genes that determine human heredity.

Collins, one of the most eminent scientists ever to identify as an evangelical Christian, staunchly defends Darwinian evolution even as he insists on God as the Creator. And he now stands at the epicenter of a dispute that increasingly agitates fellow believers. At issue: the traditional tenet (as summarized in Wheaton College’s mandatory credo) that „God directly created Adam and Eve, the historical parents of the entire human race.”

Mai mult

Sadhu Sundar Singh – CAPITOLUL-4 ‘Sadhu’

Cititi –

”SADHU ” Capitolul 4

” Eu consider toate lucrurile ca paguba, din cauza gradului cel mai inalt de cunoastere a lui Isus Hristos, pentru care am renuntat la tot”.

Mama sa ii spunea de mai multe ori: intr-o zi ai sa fi un „sadhu”.

Niciodata el nu pierduse din vedere aceasta dorinta profetica a aceleia care-l invata sa dea lui Dumnezeu primul loc in viata sa.

Dupa convertire, el auzise cu claritate ordinul divin: „Tu imi vei servi de martor”. Sosise vremea sa se supuna acestei chemari. Oare daca ar iesi sa predice evanghelia intr-o roba de „sadhu”, considerata ca sfinta in India din timpuri imemoriale, n-ar gasi o poarta deschisa? Intr-adevar aceasta roba, simbol al unei vieti ascetice,de renuntare la lume, la smerenie, ii va deschide intrarea in toate casele si chiar usile ghineceului.

Decizia sa fusese luata. Treizeci si trei de ziledupa botez la 3 octombrie 1905, acest tinar crestin de 16 ani imbraca vesmintul galben ca sofranul, al sfintilor „sadhu”.El a facut dintrinsul un om consacrat existentei de monah ratacitor, fara un loc unde sa-si repauzeze capul.

-„Am facut juramintul sa-mi consacru intreaga viata lui Hristos Mintuitorul meu si prin harul Lui, eu nu-l voi calca niciodata; in ziua cind deveni-i un „sadhu”, am imbracat aceasta roba pe viata si atita timp cit aceasta va depinde de mine, no voi schimba-o”.

Sundar Singh voia sa infatiseze poporului sau, istoria lui Isus in felul cel mai potrivit, adica intr-un mod cu totul hindus. Felul de vietuire al crestinilor constituia o dificultate pentru hindusi. Intr-adevar imbracamintea lor, obiceiurile lor de viata, totul era diferit si contrariu mentalitatii hinduse. Sundar insusi considerase altadata pe crestini ca pe niste straini, introducind obiceiuri ciudate.

Chiar dupa convertirea sa,    click sa cititi mai departe…

Mai mult

Blogosfera Evanghelică

Vizite unicate din Martie 6,2011

free counters

Va multumim ca ne-ati vizitat azi!


România – LIVE webcams de la orase mari