LIVE / În Direct – Video de la Cea de-a 45-a Conventie a Bisericilor Penticostale Romane din SUA si Canada – Descopera Pasiunea Slujirii 30 August – 2 Septembrie 2013

2014 – Convenţiile Au Început!!!!

 Fa click aici…

LIVE / In Direct - Fa click aici pentru programe

VEZI Programele 2014 in Reluare aici

CONVENTIA Bisericilor Penticostale

din Statele Unite si Canada 2014

va fi  in Portland Oregon

Philadelphia Church Portland

A 46-a Conventie a Bisericilor Penticostale Romane

va fi in Portland, Oregon. 

TEMA – ISUS DOMNESTE

Faptele Apostolilor 2:36

Invitatia: Rodica si Vasile Cinpean

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A 45-a Conventie a Bisericilor Penticostale 2013

VEZI aici 

Toate Cântãrile Convenţiei 

Pastori Penticostali Conventie 2013

Photo credit FB Nelu Filip

PREDICA de Duminica SEARA

CRISTIAN IONESCU

Slujba Duhului Sfant

Citeste transcrierea aici – http://wp.me/p1eavz-cGg

VIDEO by Credo TV

Mesaj Leonard Semenea

In English

Pastor Biserica Penticostala Seattle Washington

Predica de Duminica Dimineata

Lazar Gog

Slujirea ca expresie a iubirii de Dumnezeu si de Oameni

VEZI si

A 45-a Conventie a Bisericilor Penticostale

Phoenix, Arizona 2013

http://www.ropenti.com/index.php/live

 

Fa Click si VEZI aici LIVE / In Direct – 

http://www.ropenti.com/index.php/live

Descopera Pasiunea Slujirii

Invitatia: Pastorul Cornel Avram

Biserica Happy Valley Phoenix

Sursa http://www.ropenti.com

Program A 45-a Conventie

Phoenix Arizona Conventie 2013

***Joi 29 August 7:00 – 9:00 pm

Intrunirea Consiliului Pastoral al Convenţiei

~~~~~

***Vineri 30 August 6:00 PM – 9:00 PMUniunile Penticostale Romane SUA si Canada
Mesaje:
1. Moise – Slujitorul Credincios,
Evrei 3.5
2. Petru şi apostolii – Slujitori ai Cuvântului,
Fapte 6.2, Luca 1.2

~~~~~

***Seminarii si Conferinte Sâmbătă 10:00AM – 11:30AM

* Seminar pentru familii
Tema: Implicarea familiei în slujire
* Întâlnirea misiunilor
* Seminar de interes general
Tema: Slujirea prin Darurile Duhului Sfânt

Sâmbătă 12:00PM – 1:30PM
Conferinţa slujitorilor ordinaţi * Întâlnirea surorilor

Sambata 31 August la ora 2:00PM

Concursul biblic pentru tineret se va desfasura 1&2 Timotei

Sâmbătă 31 August 5:00 PM – 8:00 PM

Mesaje:
3. Tabita – Credinciosul cu inimă de slujitor,
Fapte 9.36-39
4. Pavel – Apostolul care alege să fie rob-slujitor,
Romani 1.1

~~~~~

***Duminică 1 Septembrie, AM 9:00 AM – 12:30 PM
Mesaje:
5. Isus Hristos – slujirea ca expresie a iubirii de Dumnezeu şi de oameni,
Ioan 13.1,4, Ioan 21.15-17
6. Isus Hristos – slujirea ca împlinire a voii lui Dumnezeu Tatăl,
Ioan 4.31-34, Luca 22.42

~~~~~

***Duminică 1 Septembrie, PM 5:00 PM – 8:00 PM
Mesaje:
7. Isus Hristos – jertfa supremă a slujirii,
Evrei 8.1-2, 9.11-14, Evr. 2.8
8. Duhul Sfânt – slujba aducătoare de viaţă;
2 Cor. 3.1-18
~~~~~
***Luni 2 Septembrie 11:00 AM – 5:00 PM
Picnic la Sahuaro Park

Eveniment organizat de Biserica Happy Valley.

Photo via Phoenix Chamber of Commerce.

Rezervatii cu discounturi speciale la aceste doua hoteluri (pana la sfarsitul lunii Iulie)

Arizona este statul Marelui Canion (poza via aici):

Screen Shot 2013-05-28 at 5.33.47 PM

Some useful links for the Arizona visitors:

 ANUL VIITOR:

CONVENTIA Bisericilor Penticostale

din Statele Unite si Canada 2014

va fi  in Portland Oregon

Philadelphia Church Portland

A 46-a Conventie a Bisericilor Penticostale Romane

va fi in Portland, Oregon. 

TEMA – ISUS DOMNESTE

Conventia penticostala 2014

Puiu Chibici – Ești necuprins de timp și spațiu

photo via All that is interesting

wanaka-new-zealand

O cantare inaltatoare – cu multumiri lui Paul Ion pentru video!!!

Ești necuprins de timp și spațiu, de-orice gândire mai presus
Ești pretutindenea în toate și totuși cât de nepătruns
Deasupra tuturor o Doamne, cu măreție strălucești
Cu-nțelepciunea-Ți fără margini, în orice clipă mă uimești.

/: Din veșnicie ești același, Iehova e numele Tău
Splendori cerești Te înconjoară,
Din veșnicie-n veșnicie ești mereu
Iehova Dumnezeu! :/

2. Ești Dumnezeu din veșnicie, izvorul tainice-i lumini
În cer Ți-e tronul de domnie, înconjurat de heruvimi
Ești Tatăl nostru bun și mare, ce ne dai pâine zi de zi
Și adunarea-n sărbătoare Îți cântă sfinte melodii.

3. În fața măreției Tale, se-nchină orice muritor
Ți se înalță osanale, Atotputernic Creator
În toate voia Ta să fie, sfințească-se Numele Tău
Vie a Ta împărăție Preasfânt și mare Dumnezeu!

~Amin~

Florin Ianovici – Primul Razboi la Care Nu Te Astepti la Biserica Betania Arad

PAGINA Florin Ianovici PREDICI aici

ianovici 2013

Predica de incurajare- Trebuie sa fim mai mult decat biruitori in inclestarile vPietii

1 Samuel 17:47 – Şi toată mulţimea aceasta va şti că Domnul nu mîntueşte nici prin sabie nici prin suliţă. Căci biruinţa este a Domnului. Şi El vă dă în mînile noastre.„

Notite din predica. Florin Ianovici –

Dragii mei, un cuvant vreau sa aduc spre inima dumneavoastra. Marturisesc ca in timp ce veneam spre Arad, Dumnezeu a asezat in inima mea un mesaj diferit de cel pe care initial doream sa vi-l transmit. Probabil ca Dumnezeu, in aceasta seara are cateva inimi pe care vrea sa le ridice. Stiu sigur ca Dumnezeu, in aceasta seara are aici oameni spre care El priveste si doreste Dumnezeu ca ei sa plece biruitori. Iubitii Domnului, spune Biblia despre un lucru aparent ciudat, ca David, care era la carm la vremea la care relateaza aceasta istorie era un tinerel. S-a grabit sa ajunga la locul unde fratii lui mai mari, trei dintre ei, se luptau impreuna cu regele Saul impotriva clasicului dusman, anume Filisteni. Ajuns acolo, spune Biblia ca el si-a grabit pasii pentru ca a auzit un lucru si anume. Ca oastea care se stransese siruri, siruri si se aliniase ca sa poata incepe razboiul scotea strigate de razboi. Nu stiu ce strigate de razboi scoteau ei, dar stiu care este strigatul de razboi al bisericii. Biblia spune ca ceva ciudat se intampla pentru ca David, apropiindu-se cu dorinta sa vada lupta, observa ca de fapt oamenii nu mai strigau, ca de fapt nimeni nu lupta, ca de si erau aliniati in siruri si erau destul de numerosi, nimeni nu scosese sabia, ci fiecare parca ar fi asteptat ceva ce nu se intampla.

Ciudat imi pare sa vii o viata intreaga la biserica si la simplele examene ale vietii tu sa nu faci absolut nimic. Ciudat imi pare ca dupa atata vreme de petrecut in biserica, la cele mai elementare inclestari ale vietii, de fapt, sa nu poti sa fii biruitor in numele celui pe care Il iubesti si Ii declari la biserica ca este totul pentru tine. Din toata inima ma rog in aceasta seara, ca Dumnezeu privind spre noi sa nu ne vada niste siruri, aliniati de batalie si nu doar sa scoatem niste strigate de razboi, ci Dumnezeu sa ne dea puterea de a fi mai mult decat biruitori in inclestarile vietii. Fratii mei, surorile mele, nimeni nu este obligat sa vina la biserica, nimeni nu este obligat sa faca lucrul acesta pentru ca trebuie. Venim la biserica pentru ca noi vrem sa ne pregatim pentru razboaiele si pentru luptele care oricum vor veni. Ele vor veni. Sa nu uiti niciodata ca prezenta ta la biserica este dorinta inimii tale. Ca de fapt, aici vii sa te pregatesti pentru ceea ce va urma. Sa nu uitati niciodata lucrul asta, ca altminteri s-ar putea sa ne trezim ca stam in scaunele acestea fara sa stim in ce stam. Eu sunt convins ca nu o sa ies bine din biserica si deja razboiul spiritual va incepe. Stiu sigur ca maine ma asteapta multe inclestari, ca viata aceasta mi-a dovedit ca luptele nu vor lipsi pana nu vom inchide ochii. Si pare nepotrivit ca noi, cand ne strangem, sa fim aliniati in siruri de bataie si atunci cand noi avem examene simple in viata, noi sa nu fim biruitori. Oare de ce? De ce se intampla lucrul asta?

Lucrul acesta se intampla de cele mai multe ori pentru ca noi ne pregatim pentru razboaiele care se vad cu ochiul liber. Te astepti la ceva in viata. Cand sunt tanar, razboiul meu principal este sa pot sa-mi gasesc un loc de munca bun si sa imi gasesc o fata cu care sa imi intemeiez o casnicie, sau un baiat. In momentul cand te apropii de 40 de ani si ceva, razboiul tau este sa ai o casa si sa ai un loc al tau in care sa poti sa te simti bine. Fie ce varsta are razboaiele ei, omul se asteapta. Nu astepti la 65 de ani sa te inscrii bunaoara la atletism, nu? La 65 de ani te astepti la o anumita evolutie in viata. La 20 de ani ai parte de anumite lupte. Insa ceva se intampla. Se intampla ca luptele pe care noi le asteptam sa le purtam, ele sunt precedate, dragii mei, de alte lupte pentru care nu suntem niciodata suficient de pregatiti ca sa le dam. Veti vedea in seara aceasta ca David, pana sa ajunga sa poarte lupta cu Goliat, aceasta lupta clara- daca ai fi intrebat pe oricine care era acolo la lupta, „De ce esti aici?” Ar fi raspuns, „Pentru ca trebuie sa biruim Filistenii.” Si totusi, nimeni nu lupta, desi erau aliniati si strigau nemaipomenit de tare si nimeni nu lupta. De ce? Pentru ca se poate ca in viata, de unde te astepti mai putin si cand te astepti mai putin sa inceapa niste razboaie pentru care nu suntem pregatiti. In seara aceasta as vrea sa vorbesc despre primul razboi la care nu te astepti. (8:00)

 Lupta cu cel din casa ta

Nimic nu ucide mai mult in viata decat dispretul oamenilor pe care-i iubesti. Spune Biblia ca David se grabea, alerga pentru ca printre altele, dorinta inimii lui, ca si dorinta tatalui lui a fost aceea sa-si cerceteze fratii. David se grabea sa afle despre ceea ce se intampla si sa duca vesti  tatalui lui. Biblia spune ca in timp ce se paropia, deodata, in fata lui iese fratele lui mai mare, Eliab. Aceasta este prima lupta pentru care nu esti pregatit. Lupta cu cel din casa ta, lupta cu cel de langa tine. Lupta cu omul la care nu te-ai fi asteptat niciodata sa lupti. ELiab se uita la el, spune Biblia, si se uita cu dispret. Nimic nu ucide mai mult in viata decat dispretul oamenilor pe care-i iubesti. Nimic nu paralizeaza in viata mai mult ca dispretul oamenilor pe care ar trebui sa te bizui si va spun in numele Domnului Isus Hristos ca nimeni n-a ucis vreodata mai mult decat am facut-o noi de aproapele nostru.

Aici este un loc sfant si ar trebui respectul fata de cel de langa tine sa fie cuvantul de ordine. Suntem ai lui Dumnezeu, sapati pe palmele Sale, rascumparati cu un pret vesnic si ar trebui sa ne iubim si sa ne respectam unii pe altii. Respectul este acela care iti da aripi in viata si te face sa infloresti. Iar dispretul este acela care iti frange aripile si te face sa nu mai poti sa faci un pas in viata. Atatia oameni raniti i-am intalnit in viata si le-am zis, „Prietene, de ce stai trantit la pamant?” pentru ca au zis ei, „Cum sa nu stau trantit la pamant, daca de dimineata pana seara, mama imi zice ca sunt un neispravit?” „Cum sa mai fac un pas,” zice sotul, cand de dimineata pana seara sunt comparat cu Ionica si cu Vasilica si n-au nici o vorba buna in casa mea si n-au nici un cuvant mangaietor?” „La ce bun,” zice femeia, sotia, „sa mai lupt, cand nu aud o vorba de mangaiere, ci numai dispret in fiecare zi din partea aceluia care mi-a jurat  la altar ca va fi alaturi de mine?”  Cum sa cresti, cum sa te duci spre Goliat plin de putere si sa lupti impotriva lui, cand de fapt, cei ce sunt langa tine si ar trebui sa te sustina in momente grele sunt primii care iti ies in cale si iti arunca un cuvant dispretuitor?

Intotdeauna sa stiti ca dispretul e o arma puternica si e o lupta teribila pentru ca el nu vine de la straini. Niciodata nu are sa ma doboare cand dusmanul sau cand omul, care stiu sigur ca nu e de partea mea, imi arunca un cuvant e ocara. La ce m-as supara cand cineva care nu ma iubeste imi arunca o vorba dispretuitoare? N-am cum sa ma supar pentru ca omul acela nu tine la mine. Dar cand omul de aproape iti arunca o vorba de ocara, atunci te loveste teribil. Niciodata lupta aceasta cu dispretul nu si-ar avea un efect, decat daca vine de aproape. Si sa stiti iubitii Domnului, mame, tati, parinti si colegi din aceasta seara: Veti fi tratati exact cum tratati. Cu ce masura masurati, cu aceea vi se va masura si voua. Respectul pe care-l aratati celor de langa voi, acela va fi cel de care va veti invrednicii in viata voastra. Totdeauna dispretul doare pentru ca este de aproape. Am putea sa stim Biblia pe de rost si nu-i gresit, este extraordinar, putem sa stim cartea de cantari din scoarta in scoarta. Putem sa repetam sau sa redam predici pe de rost, cu puncte si cu ilustratii. Daca n-avem respect unii fata de altii, fratii mei, surorile mele, noi nu am cunoscut nimic din Dumnezeu. N-avem cum sa vorbim de Dumnezeu daca in lucrurile elementare in viata n-am inteles ca Hristos a privit spre gunoiul numit Florin Ianovici  si a zis, „Tu ai pret in ochii mei”. Pentru mine Hristos a murit la cruce, pentru tine Hristos a murit la cruce, pentru noi a murit Isus Hristos la cruce. Nu doar un neinsemnat, nu un om fara valoare, dar in raport de ce este Dumnezeu, eu nu eram decat un om pierdut, nu eram decat un gunoi al acestei lumi si Hristos a zis, „Ai pret in ochii mei.” (din primele 15 minute)

In Awe of God’s Creation – Troltunga, Norway – Muntii Norvegiei – Coplesit de creatia lui Dumnezeu

Photo via All That Is Interesting.

This guy is taking a much-needed breather. To snap a shot like this, you’ve got to survive a nine-hour trek ascending 900 meters into the Norwegian sky.

Ca sa te pozezi aici, trebuie sa urci 900 de metri, in aproximativ 9 ore. Nici nu cred ca as dori asa ceva 🙂

trolltunga-norway

God gives Mathematical Proof for Christianity

photo via www.wikihow.com

AN AWESOME  ARTICLE! by Dan Delzell, pastor of Wellspring Lutheran Church in Papillion, Nebraska writes this article in The Christian Post.

It is impossible that Christianity is not God’s revelation of truth to man. Simply impossible. The math proves it beyond question. It doesn’t take faith to believe that one plus one equals two, and it doesn’t take faith to identify the religion which has mathematical certainty in its corner.

God didn’t have to give us mathematical proof of His existence, but He did it anyway. God didn’t have to give us proof of Christianity, but He chose to do so. And God didn’t have to give us proof of His love for us, but that is exactly what He did. The proof is irrefutable.

I live in Nebraska where I serve as a pastor. Imagine someone covering this entire state in silver dollars 6 feet deep. Then mark one coin and bury it anywhere across the state. Next, blindfold a man and have him choose one coin. The odds that he would choose the marked coin are the same odds of getting 8 prophecies all fulfilled in one man. God gave us about 300 fulfilled prophecies in the Person of Jesus Christ.

Here are 8 of those 300 prophecies:

(1) The Messiah will be born in Bethlehem. (Micah 5:2; Matthew 2:1; Luke 2:4-6)
(2) The Messiah will be a descendant of Jacob. (Numbers 24:17; Matthew 1:2)
(3) The Messiah will enter Jerusalem as a king riding on a donkey. (Zechariah 9:9; Mark 11:4-11)
(4) The Messiah will be betrayed by a friend. (Psalm 41:9; Luke 22:47,48)
(5) The Messiah’s betrayal money will be used to purchase a potter’s field. (Zechariah 11:13; Matthew 27:9,10)
(6) The Messiah will be spat upon and struck. (Isaiah 50:6; Matthew 26:67)
(7) The Messiah’s hands and feet will be pierced. (Psalm 22:16; John 20:25-27)
(8) Soldiers will gamble for the Messiah’s garments. (Psalm 22:18; Luke 23:34)

There is no way one man could have fulfilled all 8 of these prophecies unless God was making it happen. Who else controls history? Who else could give us such irrefutable proof for Christianity? The odds are one in one hundred quadrillion, or 1 in 100,000,000,000,000,000.

This mathematical proof was calculated by Professor Peter Stoner. He was chairman of the mathematics and astronomy departments at Pasadena City College until 1953. He then went to Westmont College in Santa Barbara, California, where he served as chairman of the science division.

You don’t have to be a mathematics professor to see that this evidence is irrefutable. No one would pick the marked coin under those conditions. No one but God could have given us these biblical prophecies, and then brought them to fulfillment right before our eyes. It is impossible that Christianity is false. The math proves it, and the Man behind the math rose from the dead, just as it had been foretold.

Read more at http://www.christianpost.com/news/the-mathematical-proof-for-christianity-is-irrefutable-96295/#0GUltOdZo5CzMs21.99

The Case against Scientism – leading scholars explore Lewis’s prophetic warnings about the abuse of science

„The new oligarchy must increasingly rely on the advice of scientists,

till in the end, the politicians become merely the scientists’ puppets”.

C. S. Lewis in „Willing Slaves of the Welfare State”.
oligarchy

More than a half century ago, famed writer C.S. Lewis warned about how science (a good thing) could be twisted in order to attack religion, undermine ethics, and limit human freedom. In this documentary „The Magician’s Twin: C.S. Lewis and the Case Against Scientism,” leading scholars explore Lewis’s prophetic warnings about the abuse of science and how Lewis’s concerns are increasingly relevant for us today.

Some quotes, followed by notes from the documentary video:

  • lewis holy trinity churchDuring the first half of the 20th century, 3 prophetic writers warned about the dark side of scientific and technological progress: (1) G K Chesterton, ‘Eugenics and other evils‘ (2) George Orwell, ‘1984‘ and (3) C S Lewis ‘Abolition of Man‘. Best known for his Narnia story and his books of Christian theology, C S Lewis also had an intense interest in the growing power of scientism- the efforts to use the methods of science to explain and control every part of human life.
  • Lewis was opposed to an ideology, which in his view had been confused with science. It was a particular materialistic approach which  wanted to reduce everything we could learn scientifically to materialistic causes- blind, undirected causes. (Angus Menuge PhD) Lewis thought that science was a perfectly legitimate enterprise. He never denied it, he in fact studied it quite a bit. (Victor Reppert Phd). Just like in all human disciplines, Lewis thought that science could be corrupted, and that some people could pursue science because they wanted power over the world and power over other people, in particular. (John G West PhD) What he saw was that you had to avoid those extremes, not in the employment of science, but in the popularization of science. (Michael Aeschliman PhD)
  • You could not afford to ignore the finding of science, the importance of scientific method, you had to see that it’s one of the greatest applications and developments of the rational method perse, a subset of the rational method. But, that it was very dangerous, and then in the 20th century we had had very malignant consequences to deify it. Scientific socialism is credibly a scientific version of politics. The Marxists called their system scientific socialism. Well, no one in their right mind, in 2012, will say that Marxism was scientific. No one in his right mind, but people did for 170 years.
  • Social Darwinist racial science in Nazi Germany. Enormous prestige was given to racialist views by their apparent clothing people such as Heckel and Münchner popularizing reductive scientific ideas with immense success. In many ways, more success in Germany than in England.
  • Lewis saw these developments: 2 World Wars, in one he served and was badly wounded, had roots in barbaric and hysterical scientistic ideas of abuses of the scientific method, abuses of scientific terminology and language, abuses of scientific faith. When warning about the abuse of science, Lewis made an unusual comparison. Although most people think of science as something modern, Lewis compared it to something ancient: MAGIC. Lewis thought that science and magic are twins. If you think about this, it might sound very strange. But Lewis was very perceptive here. In fact, he highlighted 3 different ways that science and magic really are quite similar.

(1) Science as religion.

Science has the ability to function as a religion. Certainly, a magical view of the world can give one a sense that there’s something more than just our every day lives. If you walk through a forest and think it’s enchanted it gives you a grand vision that there’s something out there that we don’t ordinarily experience.It can give you a sense of meaning. There’s a real reason why fantasy stories are so beloved… It gives people a sense of grandeur of the universe and something higher than ourselves. And in fact, for some people who aren’t religious, this magical view of the world can actually be more attractive, because it substitutes for that. In the same way, science can be an alternative religion. And during Lewis’s own time, there were people like H G Wells, who turned Darwins’ theory of evolution into this cosmic theory of life developing in this long struggle in the human universe, and then human life develops in this heroic character fighting against nature, and then, eventually, man evolves, and evolves himself through eugenics into a wave of demigods. This epic cosmic struggle of evolution was really an alternate religion for H G Wells, and you see that same thing today, whether it be Oxford biologist Richard Dawkins who says that „Darwin has made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist„. Or, in 2012, we had 10-20,000 people converge on Washington DC for this Reason Rally, where a lot of people testified that they really offer science as a religion. Today, you see a lot of people speaking in the name of science, who offer science as a quasi religion. It’s what gives their life meaning. Another area where we see this today is in the celebration of Darwin’s birthday. Hundreds of colleges, community organizations, if not thousands around the world, on Feb. 12th, every year, hold Darwin day celebrations. It really takes on the trappings of a religion.

(2) Science as credulity

A second way science and magic are similar, according to C S Lewis, is their encouragement of a lack of skepticism. Again, this may seem just completely outlandish, because science, how does that promote gullibility? How? It’s supposed to be just the hard facts. Now, in magic, you can think there’s a witch doctor and the tribe believes whatever the witch doctor says. And so, magical thinking can promote a type of credulous thinking where you just trust what the authority figure says. But, how does science promote that type of credulous and gullible thinking? Lewis pointed out that in the modern world, people will believe almost anything if it’s dressed up in the name of science.

For Lewis, one of the leading examples of science fueling gullibility was Freudianism. Lewis had an interest in Sigmund Freud since his days an Oxford undergraduate. Lewis was intrigued by some of the claims of psychoanalysis, but he ultimately rejected the efforts by Freud’s followers to explain everything from religion to stealing cars as a result of our subconscious urges. Lewis pointed out that if you actually take Freud’s view to its eventual conclusion, that actually undermines even the belief in Freudianism. Lewis’s point is: Where does this end? If you really think that all reasoning, fundamentally, is based on sub rational urges and that we can’t analyze those urges, and there isn’t real reason we can judge, based on evidence, and that we can’t be self critical, then that destroys Freudianism, just like it destroys everything else.

Shortly after Lewis accepted Christianity, he satirized Freud in his allegory ‘The Pilgrim’s Regress’. In Lewis’s story, the main character, John, winds up thrown in jail by a character named Sigismund enlightened. Sigismund was actually SIgmund Freud’s real first name, so this was very much a parody about Freud. But, what is this jail he is thrown into? Well, it’s a jail governed by this giant, and this giant has a particular propensity, that anything that he looks at becomes transparent. And so, when this pilgrim character is thrown into this dungeon, into this jail, it’s a jail of horrors because whenever he looks at someone , he doesn’t see them, he sees their insides, he sees through them. It’s like a house of horrors. And that was Lewis’s picture of where Freudianism leads you: If you try to deconstruct everything, you’re left with nothing

Another example of science inspired credulity, according to Lewis, was what he called evolutionism- the popular idea that matter could magically transform itself into complex and conscious living things, through a blind and unguided  process. Lewis’s doubts about unguided evolution went back to his days as a soldier in World War I. While recovering from shrapnel wounds, a young Lewis read the book ‘Creative Revolution’ by french natural philosopher Henri Bergson. Bergson questioned the ability of Darwin’s theory to account for complex structures, like the human eye, through a blind process like natural selection. Lewis believed that evolutionism, like Freudianism, contained a fatal self contradiction regarding the human mind, according to the Darwinian view. Reason was simply the unforeseen and unintended by-product of a mindless process based on survival of the fittest. Lewis pointed out the key difficulty with the Darwinian account of reason: „If my own mind is the product of the irrational,” he asked, „how shall I trust my mind when it tells me about evolution?” In his personal copy of Charles Darwin’s autobiography, Lewis underlined passages where Darwin had asked himself the same question. (16:00) The idea that a blind and purposeless process without a mind  can produce things like human beings that have minds, and produce moral beliefs in things that sometimes go against our need for physical survival, the idea that a mindless process of survival of the fittest could create such things, really was an outlandish one, according to Lewis. How could a mindless process produce minds? And, to think that it could really just shows how gullible people can be in the name of science.

(3) Science as power

The third similarity between science and magic, according to Lewis, is the quest for power. Magic was about the quest for power. Magicians wanted to have power over the world and over the universe. They wanted to harness the deeper powers of nature in order to control it, and Lewis said that much of modern science, not all, but much of modern science was actually developed fro power over the world. For many people in the 20th century, the power of modern science was its greatest virtue. They hoped science would usher in a new age of peace and prosperity- a scientific utopia. For the scientific utopians of Lewis’s era, science was the savior that would allow us to remake our world. And of course that can be good. Modern science can bring us good things. Many things: from the microwave oven to the computers, to life saving treatments of modern medicine, which Lewis certainly appreciated, But, on the other hand, that tendency to want to control things can bring us the Orwellian state of George Orwell’s 1984. And so, Lewis thought that modern science, in fact, was far more dangerous than magic, because magic failed. Magic doesn’t work at the end of the day. And so, it wasn’t so dangerous because people couldn’t use it to control the world. Modern science has the potential that you really can control  people, if you find the right drugs, or find the right treatments, you can manipulate them. And so, if you don’t have some other way of protecting to remedy what you do in the name of science, some ethical basis that isn’t dictated by science itself, that can control it, then you are facing a really bleak future.

1927 Supreme Court

Lewis’s critique of scientific utopianism was at the heart of his novel ‘That Hideous Strength’, which tells the story of a conspiracy to transform England into a Scientific dictatorship. The conspiracy is led by a government bureaucracy, with a deceptively innocuous name  of the National Institute of Coordinated Experiments or NICE. „That Hideous Strength’ and Huxley’s ‘Brave New World’ are the 2 greatest dystopias  in our language, in the 20th century. The agenda of NICE in ‘That Hideous Strength’ reads like a wish list drawn up by England’s leading scientific social reformers. It included sterilization of the unfit, selective breeding, biochemical conditioning, experimentation on both animals and criminals, and above all- truly scientific planning. A scientific planning that is pretending to provide a new humanity, that is doing away with traditional ethics, that is doing away with all traditional restraints. (United States 1927: Forced Sterilization Upheld. Supreme Court Rules: „Three generations of imbeciles are enough”. Alabama 1947: Blacks denied Penicillin as part of US Public Health Service study on effects of syphilis.) Lewis depicts a world in ‘That Hideous Strength’, in which nothing is sacred. Daniel Dennet has told us that the essence of modernity is that nothing is sacred.  Nothing is sacred, which includes the human person, and when that happens, there are no distinctions between individuals, or humans and animals, or humans and vegetables, and humans and minerals and we have the kind of things we had in the 20th century.

In the 2 decades before his death, Lewis became increasingly alarmed by the scientific authoritarianism. Lewis was very concerned by the dogmatic use of science, and that is why he wrote his novel ‘That Hideous Strength’, that is why he wrote his book ‘The Abolition of Man’, where he actually worries and somewhat predicts the rise of a new class of people, of experts, speaking in the name of science, who would dictate to everyone else. In fact, by the end of his life, Lewis was worrying about the rise of what he called scientocracy- government and society that claim to be based on the claims of modern science, but, in reality really is based on a scientific click of a few people who are speaking in the name of science. And maybe they’re adopting the majority view of science, but, they’re claiming the right to rule based on their scientific knowledge and expertise.

barcode at birthLewis’s concern for the authoritarian science seems eerily prophetic. (See photos of actual headlines form newspapers at the 23rd minute) In a world driven by science and technology, those who question the new order, like C S Lewis did, increasingly find themselves labeled anti-science. C S Lewis would have rejected the charge. Lewis did not accept the idea that science was a special form of knowledge, that was somehow immune to inspection, or somehow cordoned off from the nonspecialist assessing the deliverance of the sciences. Lewis was well aware, first of all, that there is no such thing as science, as such. There are sciences. And each science has its particular methods, and its particular area of study, and also, that the sciences to be good need to interact with one another, but they do so by means of the larger tools of good rational critical thinking. And so, the things that scientists say are subject to review by everyone who is able to think critically, to think rationally. Lewis did not deny that scientific expertise might be necessary for good public policy in many areas. But he insisted that science alone was not sufficient. Knowing how cells work, or knowing how ecosystems work doesn’t tell you what you ought to do for your society, because public policy is not just about technical expertise as to how things work. It’s about what good it’s worth having it in first place and as C  S Lewis pointed out, on these questions a scientific training gives you no added value. Scientists are not moral philosophers. Yet, political and social judgments involve, not just how do things work, and how can we make them work better? But, how should we act, and what’s worth spending money on, and what’s worth doing, and what freedoms are worth giving up or not?

healthcare mandate

On these sort of moral and ethical questions, someone in science training, it doesn’t give them the right to dictate to the rest of society. C S Lewis: „I dread government in the name of science, that is how tyrannies come in”. C S Lewis thought that science was a good thing, but he also thought that it held some really strong dangers. The biggest danger, really, was the penchant to control. In a scientific view, that is the only way that we have knowledge of the world. And so, if you think that I have the scientific truth about something, that’s end of story. I know everything. That really tends to feed a power trip, whether you’re a scientist or a politician who is trying to latch on to the prestige of science, you really have people who are going to abuse their power because they thing, „Look, we’re the only ones who know what should happen, because we know how the universe really works. Therefore, we should be able to dictate what our cultural beliefs are, we should dictate what our government should do, how we should design governmental programs, we should dictate all manner of public policy and anyone who doesn’t have a scientific training or isn’t part of the consensus view of science is basically stupid or against progress, or against science, and so should be swept by the wayside and shouldn’t be listened to. And Lewis thought that that almost totalitarian impulse was really a dangerous thing.

Lewis was properly so, frightened by that potential within science. That’s why he stressed, „We really need limits on science and that there is something behind science, a larger, transcendent ethical sphere behind science and that we aren’t just blind matter  in motion, that we’re part of a designed universe that actually sets limits on what we should and shouldn’t do. It’s an age old problem: How do we prevent something good to being twisted for evil ends? C S Lewis hoped that scientists themselves would find a way to rescue science from scientists, creating a regenerate science that respected human rights and honored human dignity. A science that would no longer be the magician’s twin.

The Magician’s Twin: C.S. Lewis and the Case against Scientism

Blogosfera Evanghelică

Vizite unicate din Martie 6,2011

free counters

Va multumim ca ne-ati vizitat azi!


România – LIVE webcams de la orase mari