”Îmi pasă de tine” 2014 Vladimir Pustan Cireșarii – A doua șansă (scurt metraj)

”Îmi pasă de tine” 2014

Implică-te și tu!
Campania începe ÎN CURÂND… Detalii pewww.imipasadetine.ro

Anul trecut ne-am adresat inimii, anul acesta ne adresăm minții. Sunt mulți cei care au plecat din biserică (indiferent de confesiunea religioasă) și vrem să se întoarcă acasă. Cunosc Cuvântul lui Dumnezeu, au cunoscut dragostea și puterea Lui și faptul că au păcătuit îi fac să privească cerul lipsiți de speranță. De aceea împreună cu voi trebuie să le spunem că există iertare și reabilitare cu o singură condiție, să își dorească…
Ne-am gândit că 25.000 de oameni pot auzi și pot vedea bunătatea lui Dumnezeu. Anul acesta vom multiplica CD-ul pentru fiii rispitori în 25.000 de exemplare și împreună îi vom căuta și îi vom sprijini să se întoarcă acasă.
Costul total al campaniei este de 39.890 de lei (8,800 de euro, 12,050 USD, 7,250 GBP). Avem nevoie de 7.978 de oameni care să dăruiască fiecare 5 lei (1,1 euro, 1,49 USD sau 0,91 GBP). Costul final al unui CD este de 1.6 lei (0,22 euro, 0,30 USD sau 0,18 GBP).

Cireșarii – Îmi pasă de Tine

Un proiect Cireșarii la aniversarea a zece ani de activitate. Implică-te și TU! http://www.imipasadetine.ro

Donează pentru acest proiect , roagă-te, distribuie CD-uri și promovează campania. Ajută-ne să adunăm 100.000 de vizionări.

Îmi pasă de tine – A doua șansă

a doua sansa

Au interpretat:
Abel Lazăr (fiul risipitor)
Lorena Lazăr
Negru Vasile Adrian

Mulțumim tuturor celor care v-ați intrat în rol.
Dani L, Emil R, Paula R, Marius G, Florin G, Adi P, Cosmin, Dodi M, Dan V, Nicu D, David S.
Daca ratacești, nu uita: Ești binevenit ACASA!

Daca ai prieteni care ratacesc, pregatește-te sa îi primești.
Comanda cd-ul „ÎMI PASA DE TINE” și oferă-l cu credință.
Detalii pe: http://www.imipasadetine.ro

Reclame

Prăjitura si Romani 8

Dati-mi voie sa va spun aici una din ilustratiile mele preferate, mai ales cand mi-e dor de o prajitura buna. Si mi-e dor adesea de o prajitura buna.

Va marturisesc, noi stam la bloc si uneori vin acasa si in zona miroase bine cand cobori din masina. Ma rog, „Doamne, da sa fie de la noi.” Si trebuie sa spun ca 99% din cazuri e asa.

Ganditi-va la o prajitura buna, nu una comandata de nu stiu unde, una care a-i facut-o acasa. Prajitura aia are acolo in ea o gramada de ingrediente. E faina, zahar, ulei, oua, praf de copt, vanilie, tot felul.

Acum pune-te la masa si spune-i sotiei tale, „Draga, da-mi prajitura s-o manac.” Si ea o sa-ti dea faina, o sa-ti dea niste sare, o sati dea ulei, o sa-ti dea praf de copt.

Trebuie sa anunte salvarea. Dar cand gospodina buna ia toate ingredientele astea si le amesteca si le pune toate la un loc si apoi pune totul intr-un cuptor care e incins la sute de grade si-l baga acolo inauntru si incepe mirosul acela teribil (de bun). Eu, daca n-ar fi mirosul as fi cu cel putin 20 kg mai subtire, pentru ca nu mi-e foame intotdeauna, dar mirosul e  asa o problema. Abia apoi, prajitura aceea este extraordinara.

La fel este si viata. Uneori e ca zaharul, dar uneori e ca sarea de lamaie. Uneori e asa de dulce si asa de parfumata precum vanilia. Dar alteori e atat de scarboasa. Sunt evenimente si situatii princ are trecem, de neinteles si daca le iei pe fiecare separat iti pierzi mintile si iti pui streangul de gat. Si spui, „Nu mai este nici o sansa.”

Dar cand le pui toate la un loc si incepi sa intelegi perspectiva care Dumnezeu o are, e o alta perspectiva, nu e perspectiva noastra limitata. Este perspectiva lui, a unuia care priveste de sus si vede toate lucrurile impreuna cum lucreaza spre binele celor ce-l iubesc pe Dumnezeu. Adica, spre binele celor in care El vrea sa-si indeplineasca planul Lui. Si planul Lui este s ane faca asemenea chipului fiului Sau.

Romani 8:28
De altă parte, ştim că toate lucrurile lucrează împreună spre binele celorce iubesc pe Dumnezeu, şi anume, spre binele celorce sînt chemaţi după planul Său.

Citeste mai mult aici…

David şi Solomon au existat – Decodificarea unui mesaj de 3.000 de ani confirmă existenţa regelui Solomon

Pictura Tissot – Solomon – dedicarea Templului (wikipedia) SURSA L. Romana Semnele Timpului

Câteva caractere sculptate într-un vas vechi de 3.000 de ani s-au dovedit a fi nu doar cel mai vechi text alfabetic scris descoperit în Ierusalim, ci şi o puternică dovadă în favoarea existenţei regelului Solomon, menţionat în Biblie.

textconfirmasolomon (Foto: zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com)Mesajul, încă nedescifrat complet, este însă important prin simpla sa existenţă, explică Gershon Galil, profesor de istorie antică şi studii biblice la Universitatea din Haifa. Pe laterala vasului se poate înţelege expresia „al douăzecilea şi al treizecilea an al domniei lui Solomon”, ceea ce confirmă existenţa regelui Solomon.

„Dovada pe care o avem astăzi, ca şi altele pe care le-am descoperit, ne arată clar că David şi Solomon au existat cu adevărat, au fost regi importanţi şi că acestea nu sunt doar nişte poveşti din Biblie. Regatul lui Solomon a existat cu adevărat”, explică Galil într-un interviu pentru Foxnews.

În plus, dovada concretă a unui alfabet ebraic face ca vechii israeliţi să fi fost beneficiarii unui sistem administrativ şi fiscal încă de la jumătatea celui de-al zecelea secol înainte de Christos – mult mai devreme decât se ştia până acum din dovezile arheologice.

Aceasta înseamnă şi că regele Solomon este cel care a construit templul şi care a extins Ierusalimul. „În afara textelor biblice, până acum nu aveam vreo dovadă în acest sens, dar textul acesta o confirmă”, a declarat profesorul.

Three letters of the inscription are incomplete, and Galil translates them to read, „yah-yin chah-lak,” which is Hebrew for „inferior wine.” The first half of the text indicates the twentieth or thirtieth year of Solomon’s reign – making the entire inscription a label of sorts for the jug’s contents.

SURSA L. Romana Semnele Timpului  – English –  Foxnews.

Message decoded:
3,000-year-old text may prove
biblical tale of King Solomon

A few characters scratched into the side of an ancient earthenware jug have archaeologists scrambling for their dictionaries – and wondering if it corroborates the Bible’s stories of King Solomon.

The Ophel inscription – 3,000-year-old characters found in Israel in July – is the earliest alphabetical written text ever found in Jerusalem. It proves the real basis behind the parables and stories in the world’s most famous book, said Gershon Galil, a professor of ancient history and biblical studies at the University of Haifa.

„We are dealing here with real kings, and the kingdom of David and Solomon was a real fact,” Galil told FoxNews.com, in a phone call from Israel.

But the world’s leading archaeologists are still hotly debating the meaning of the inscription. Gershon offers what he calls the „only reasonable translation,” noting at the same time that the very existence of the text is as important as its meaning.

‘If Obama were to achieve something, he would not claim that Bush did it. It’s not in human nature!’

– Haifa University professor Gershon Galil

„The most important thing this tells us is that somebody during this time knew how to write something,” he said.

Three letters of the inscription are incomplete, and Galil translates them to read, „yah-yin chah-lak,” which is Hebrew for „inferior wine.” The first half of the text indicates the twentieth or thirtieth year of Solomon’s reign – making the entire inscription a label of sorts for the jug’s contents.

He explains that the text must be written in an early form of southern Hebrew because it is the only language of the time to use two yods(Hebrew letters) to spell the word wine. Galil also suggests that the „inferior wine” was probably given to laborers who were helping to build the burgeoning city of Jerusalem.

If Hebrew as a written language did exist during the time of the inscription, it places the ancient Israelites in Jerusalem earlier than previously believed, under a time the Bible indicates was King Solomon’s rule.

According to Galil’s understanding of the text, the writing ability demonstrated by the inscription proves the existence of a fully functioning administration that collected taxes, prepared storage jars and performed other duties as early as the second half of the 10th century BC.

„The Bible claims that Solomon built the temple and that he was the man that enlarged the city,” explained Galil. Outside of biblical texts, there has not been any evidence that Solomon in the mid-10th century BC ordered the building of the First Temple, the ancient Israelites’ place of worship where the Dome of the Rock currently stands.

Some suggest Judean King Hezekiah actually built the temple in Solomon’s name. Galil scoffed at the suggestion.

„If Obama were to achieve something, he would not claim that Bush did it. It’s not in human nature! Solomon built the temple, not Hezekiah.”

„Even if my reading is not the right one, the fact that somebody knew how to write [in Hebrew] during this time, shows that somebody could have easily written a book a little while later like [the Old Testament’s] book of Samuel and Judges.”

Galil hopes that in years to come, more evidence will be found to support the Kingdoms of Solomon and David.

„The evidence that we have today and each year we have so much more that David and Solomon were real and important kings and not just tales of the Bible,” he said.

The Temple according to the Bible (via wikipedia)

The earliest source of information on the First Temple is the Hebrew Bible (or Old Testament). According to the biblical sources, the temple was constructed under King Solomon during the united monarchy of Israel and Judah. This puts the date of its construction in the mid-10th century BCE. Some scholars have speculated that a Jebusite sanctuary may have previously occupied the site. During the kingdom of Judah, the temple was dedicated to Yahweh, the god of Israel, and is said to have housed the Ark of the Covenant. Rabbinic sources state that the First Temple stood for 410 years and, based on the 2nd-century work Seder Olam Rabbah, place construction in 832 BCE and destruction in 422 BCE (3338AM), 165 years later than secular estimates.

The following is a summary of the history according to Book of Samuel and Book of Kings, with notes on the variations to this story in the later Book of Chronicles.

The Mishkan (dwelling place) of the god of Israel was originally the portable shrine called the Ark of the Covenant, which was placed in the Tabernacle tent. King David, having unified all Israel, brought the Ark to his new capital, Jerusalem, intending to build there a temple in order to house the Ark in a permanent place. David purchased a threshing-floor for the site of the Temple (1 Chronicles 21–22), but then Yahweh told him that he would not be permitted to build a temple. The task of building therefore passed to David’s son and successor Solomon. 1 Kings 6:1–381 Kings Chapter 7, andChapter 8 describe the construction and dedication of the Temple under Solomon.

King Solomon requested the aid of King Hiram of Tyre to provide both the quality materials and skilled craftsmen. During the construction, a special inner room, named in Hebrew Kodesh Hakodashim (Holy of Holies), was prepared to receive and house the Ark of the Covenant (1 Kings 6:19); and when the Temple was dedicated, the Ark—containing the Tablets of Stone—was placed therein (1 Kings 8:6–9).

The exact location of the First Temple is unknown: it is believed to have been situated upon the hill which forms the site of the 1st century Second Temple and present-day Temple Mount, where the Dome of the Rock is situated. However, two other, slightly different sites have been proposed on this same hill: one places the stone altar at the location of the rock which is now beneath the gilded dome, with the rest of the temple to the west. The Well of Souls was, according to this theory, a pit for the remnants of the blood services of the korbanot. The other theory places theHoly of Holies atop this rock. Still another location has recently been proposed between the Dome of the Rock and the gilded dome, based on orientation to the eastern wall, drainage channels, orientation of the platform stones, and the location of a possible Boaz pillar base.

2 Chronicles 12:9, and 1 Kings 14:26 describe the Sack of Jerusalem by the Pharaoh Shishaq, who „took away the treasures of the house of the LORD, and the treasures of the king’s house.”

2 Kings 12:4–16 describes arrangements for the refurbishment of the Temple in the time of king Jehoash of Judah in the 9th century BCE. According to 2 Kings 14:14 the Temple was looted by Jehoash of Israel in the early 8th century and again by King Ahaz in the late 8th century (2 Kings 16:8). Ahaz also installed some cultic innovations in the Temple which were abhorrent to the author of 1–2 Kings (2 Kings 16:10–18).

The Temple also figures in the account of King Hezekiah, who turned Judah away from idols; when later in the same century Hezekiah is confronted with a siege by theAssyrian king Sennacherib (2 Kings 18:23, 19:1 and the Taylor prism), Hezekiah „instead of plundering the temple treasuries… now uses the temple the way it is designed to be used — as a house of prayer (2 Kings 19:1–14).

Hezekiah’s son Manasseh, however, was much different from his father; during his reign of the early and middle seventh century (2 Kings 21:4–9), Manasseh made innovations to the Temple cult. He has been described as a Solomon who also fell into idolatry, and Manasseh is described as a king who „makes” (2 Kings 21:3–7) or „builds” (2 Kings 21:3) high places (cf. 1 Kings 11:7) (see Deuteronomy 12 for the prohibition against high place worship), yet while Solomon’s idolatry was punished by a divided kingdom, Manasseh’s idolatry was punished by exile.

King Josiah, the grandson of Manasseh, refurbished and made changes to the Temple by removing idolatrous vessels and destroying the idolatrous priesthood c. 621 BCE (2 Kings 22:3–9; 23:11–12). He also suppressed worship at altars other than the Temple’s.

The Temple was plundered by the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar when the Babylonians attacked Jerusalem during the brief reign of Jehoiachin c. 598 (2 Kings 24:13), Josiah’s grandson. A decade later, Nebuchadnezzar again besieged Jerusalem and after 30 months finally breached the city walls in 587 BCE, subsequently burning the Temple, along with most of the city (2 Kings 25). According to Jewish tradition, the Temple was destroyed on Tisha B’Av, the 9th day of Av (Hebrew calendar).

Architectural description in the Bible

A sketch of Solomon’s Temple based on descriptions in the Tanakh

Several temples in Mesopotamia, many in Egypt, and some of the Phoenicians are now known. The description given of Solomon’s Temple in the Bible is not a copy of any of these, but embodied features recognisable in all of them. Its general form is reminiscent of Egyptian sanctuaries and closely matches that of other ancient temples in the region, however the complexity of inner chambers and unique functions does distinguish the temple strongly.

The detailed descriptions provided in the Tanakh and educated guesses based on the remains of other temples in the region are the sources for reconstructions of its appearance. Technical details are lacking, since the scribes who wrote the books were not architects or engineers. Nevertheless, the recorded plans and measurements have inspired Replicas of the Jewish Temple and influenced later structures around the world.

Reconstructions differ; the following is largely based on Easton’s Bible Dictionary and the Jewish Encyclopedia:

Most Holy Place

The Kodesh Hakodashim, or Holy of Holies, (1 Kings 6:19; 8:6), also called the „Inner House” (6:27), (Heb. 9:3) was 20 cubits in length, breadth, and height. The usual explanation for the discrepancy between its height and the 30-cubit height of the temple is that its floor was elevated, like the cella of other ancient temples.[12] It was floored and wainscotted with cedar of Lebanon (1 Kings 6:16), and its walls and floor were overlaid with gold (6:20, 21, 30). It contained two cherubim of olive-wood, each 10 cubits high (1 Kings 6:16, 20, 21, 23–28) and each having outspread wings of 10 cubits span, so that, since they stood side by side, the wings touched the wall on either side and met in the center of the room. There was a two-leaved door between it and the Holy Place overlaid with gold (2 Chr. 4:22); also a veil of tekhelet (blue), purple, and crimson and fine linen (2 Chr. 3:14; compareExodus 26:33). It had no windows (1 Kings 8:12) and was considered the dwelling-place of the „name” of God.

The color scheme of the veil was symbolic. Blue represented the heavens, while red or crimson represented the earth. Purple, a combination of the two colors, represents a meeting of the heavens and the earth.

View of the House with ceiling removed. This image is a rendering of a 3-D computer model.

Hekhal

The Hekhal, or Holy Place, (1 Kings 8:8–10), is also called the „greater house” (2 Chr. 3:5) and the „temple” (1 Kings 6:17); the word also means „palace”, was of the same width and height as the Holy of Holies, but 40 cubits in length. Its walls were lined with cedar, on which were carved figures of cherubim, palm-trees, and open flowers, which were overlaid with gold. Chains of gold further marked it off from the Holy of Holies. The floor of the Temple was of fir-wood overlaid with gold. The door-posts, of olive-wood, supported folding-doors of fir. The doors of the Holy of Holies were of olive-wood. On both sets of doors were carved cherubim, palm-trees, and flowers, all being overlaid with gold (1 Kings 6:15 et seq.)

Etymology

The Hebrew noun hekhal (Hebrew היכל) in Classical Hebrew means „a large building”. This can be either the main building of the Temple in Jerusalem (that is the nave, or sanctuary, of the Temple), or a palace such as the „palace” of Ahab, king of Samaria, or the „palace” of the King of Babylon.

Usage

Hekhal is used 80 times in the Massoretic Text of the Hebrew Bible. Of these, 70 refer to the House of the LORD (in Hebrew Bible בֵּית יְהוָה beit Yahweh), the other 10 are references to palaces. There is no reference to any part of the tabernacle using this term in the Hebrew Bible.

„In the year that king Uzziah died. I saw the LORD sitting upon a throne high and lifted up, and His train filled the hekhal (sanctuary).” Isaiah 6:1.

Use in architecture

The Jerusalem Temple

In older English versions of the Bible, including the King James, the term „temple” is used to translate hekhal. In modern versions more reflective of archeological research, the distinction is made of different sections of the whole Temple. Scholars and archeologists generally agree on the structure of Solomon’s Temple as described in 1 Kings 6:3-5, with the main building, the hekhal, in English now sometimes called „the sanctuary,” the devir, the inner sanctuary, and finally the Holy of Holies. This main building of the Temple is depicted on coins from the Bar Kokhba revolt.

This main building was between the outer altar, where most sacrifices were performed, and inside at the far end was the entry to the Holy of Holies, originally containing the Ark of the Covenant. The main hekhal, contained a number of sacred ritual objects including the seven branched candlestick, the inner altar for incense offerings (also called the „Golden Altar”), and the table of the showbread.

Synagogues

The same architectural layout of the temple was adopted in synagogues leading to the hekhal being applied in Sephardi usage to the Ashkenazi Torah ark, the equivalent of the nave.

Porch

The Ulam, or porch, acted as an entrance before the Temple on the east (1 Kings 6:3; 2 Chr. 3:4; 9:7). This was 20 cubits long (corresponding to the width of the Temple) and 10 cubits deep (1 Kings 6:3). (ESV 2 Chr. 3:4) notes that this porch was 120 cubits high. The description does not specify whether a wall separated it from the next chamber. In the porch stood the two pillars Jachin and Boaz (1 Kings 7:21; 2 Kings 11:14; 23:3), which were 18 cubits in height.

Chambers

Chambers were built about the Temple on the southern, western and northern sides (1 Kings 6:5–10). These formed a part of the building and were used for storage. They were probably one story high at first; two more may have been added later.

Courts

Exterior view of the entire Temple complex as depicted in a 3-D computer model

Closer view of the Inner Court and House as depicted in a 3-D computer model

According to the Bible, two courts surrounded the Temple. The Inner Court (1 Kings 6:36), or Court of the Priests (2 Chr. 4:9), was separated from the space beyond by a wall of three courses of hewn stone, surmounted by cedar beams (1 Kings 6:36). It contained the Altar of burnt-offering (2 Chr. 15:8), the Brazen Sea laver (4:2–5, 10) and ten other lavers (1 Kings 7:38, 39). A brazen altar stood before the Temple (2 Kings 16:14), its dimensions 20 cubits square and 10 cubits high (2 Chr. 4:1). The Great Court surrounded the whole Temple (2 Chr. 4:9). It was here that people assembled to worship. (Jeremiah 19:14; 26:2).

Brazen Sea

The large basin known as the „Brazen Sea” measured 10 cubits wide brim to brim, 5 cubits deep and with a circumference of 30 cubits around the brim, rested on the backs of twelve oxen (1 Kings 7:23–26). The Book of Kings gives its capacity as „2,000baths” (90 cubic meters), but Chronicles (2 Chr. 4:5–6) inflates this to three thousand baths (136 cubic meters) and states that its purpose was to afford opportunity for the purification by immersion of the body of the priests.

The lavers, each of which held „forty baths” (1 Kings 7:38), rested on portable holders made of bronze, provided with wheels, and ornamented with figures of lions, cherubim, and palm-trees. The author of the books of the Kings describes their minute details with great interest (1 Kings 7:27–37). Josephus reported that the vessels in the Temple were composed of Orichalcum inAntiquities of the Jews. According to 1 Kings 7:48 there stood before the Holy of Holies a golden altar of incense and a table forshowbread. This table was of gold, as were also the five candlesticks on each side of it. The implements for the care of the candles—tongs, basins, snuffers, and fire-pans—were of gold; and so were the hinges of the doors.

Archaeology

Because of the religious and political sensitivities involved, no archaeological excavations and only limited surface surveys of the Temple Mount have been conducted since Warren’s expedition of 1867-70.There is no direct archaeological evidence for the existence of Solomon’s Temple. This building is not mentioned in surviving extra-biblical accounts.

  • In 2007, artifacts dating to the 8th to 6th centuries BCE were described as being possibly the first physical evidence of human activity at the Temple Mount during the First Temple period. The findings included animal bones; ceramic bowl rims, bases, and body sherds; the base of a juglet used to pour oil; the handle of a small juglet; and the rim of a storage jar.
  • By 2006, the Temple Mount Sifting Project had recovered numerous artifacts dating from the 8th to 7th centuries BCE from soil removed in 1999 by the Islamic Religious Trust (Waqf) from the Solomon’s Stables area of the Temple Mount. These include stone weights for weighing silver and a First Temple period bulla, or seal impression, containing ancient Hebrew writing which includes the name Netanyahu ben Yaush. Netanyahu is a name mentioned several times in the Book of Jeremiah while the name Yaush appears in the Lachish letters. However, the combination of names was unknown to scholars.
  • A thumb-sized ivory pomegranate measuring 44 millimetres (1.7 in) in height bearing an ancient Hebrew inscription „Sacred donation for the priests in the House ofYHVH” was believed to have adorned a sceptre used by the high priest in Solomon’s Temple. It was considered the most important item of biblical antiquities in theIsrael Museum’s collection. However, in 2004, the Israel Antiquities Authority reported the inscription to be a forgery, though the ivory pomegranate itself was dated to the 14th or 13th century BCE. This was based on the report’s claim that 3 incised letters in the inscription stopped short of an ancient break, as they would have if carved after the ancient break was made. Since then, it has been proven that one of the letters was indeed carved prior to the ancient break, and the status of the other two letters is now in question. Some paleographers and others have continued to insist that the inscription is ancient and the authenticity of this artifact is still the object of discussion.
  • Another artifact, the Jehoash Inscription contains a 15-line description of King Jehoash’s ninth-century BCE restoration of the Temple. Its authenticity was called into question by a report by the Israel Antiquities Authority, which said that the surface patina contained microfossils of foraminifera. As these fossils do not dissolve in water, they cannot occur in a calcium carbonate patina, leading initial investigators to conclude that the patina must be an artificial chemical mix applied to the stone by forgers. As of late 2012, the academic community is split on whether the table is authentic or not. Commenting on a 2012 report by geologists arguing for the authenticity of the inscription, in October 2012, Hershel Shanks (who believes the inscription is genuine) wrote the current situation was that most Hebrew language scholars believe that the inscription is a forgery and geologists that it is genuine, and thus „Because we rely on experts, and because there is an apparently irresolvable conflict of experts in this case, BAR has taken no position with respect to the authenticity of the Jehoash Inscription.”
  • In 1940 American archaeologist Nelson Glueck „proclaimed … that he had discovered the Edomite mines controlled by King Solomon,” used to construct the Temple’s furnishings. Later in 1997, investigating the role of „metallurgy in [the] social evolution” of Southern Jordan, University of California anthropologist Tom Levy „started probing the site known as Khirbat en Nahas (Arabic for „ruins of copper”).” The samples Levy sent off to „Oxford for radiocarbon dating confirmed that Glueck had been on the right track: This was a tenth-century copper production site ‒ and Levy adds … ‘the closest copper source to Jerusalem.'” In response to these findings archaeologist Amihai Mazar has stated, „I believe that if, one day, we should find the copper objects from the temple in Jerusalem, it will prove to come from this area”.
  • An ostracon sometimes referred to as the House of Yahweh ostracon was discovered at Tel Arad, dated to 6th century BCE which mentions a temple which is probably the Temple in Jerusalem.

Alte articole de interes

ENGLEZA

The Holiness of God – R C SPROUL Series available to watch free online

You can watch this series online for free, or take it as a course from lignoier.org

The Holiness of God

The Holiness of God examines the meaning of holiness and why people are both fascinated and terrified by a holy God. This series closely explores God’s character, leading to new insights on sin, justice, and grace. The result is a new awareness of our dependence upon God’s mercy and a discovery of the awesomeness of His majestic holiness. Dr. R.C. Sproul says, “The holiness of God affects every aspect of our lives — economics, politics, athletics, romance — everything with which we are involved.”

  • The Importance of Holiness
  • The Trauma of Holiness
  • Holiness and Justice
  • The Insanity of Luther
  • The Meaning of Holiness
  • The Holiness of Christ

Watch Lectures in this Teaching Series here – http://www.ligonier.org/learn/series/holiness_of_god/

 

Moody Radio (Chicago) launching Radical with David Platt

david-platt-itickets-com.

david-platt-itickets-com.

CHICAGO (Moody Radio) – On Jan. 14, 2014, Moody Radio and Radical, the resource ministry of pastor David Platt, announced an official partnership for a new daily teaching program called Radical with David Platt.

„This is a historic partnership,” said Collin Lambert, vice president of Moody Radio. „David Platt will be one of the first voices of his generation to have a daily, national teaching program on Christian radio and we are incredibly excited to bring his solid, passionate Bible teaching to a whole new audience.” The 35-year-old pastor of The Church at Brook Hills in Birmingham, Ala., also is a best-selling author and sought-after conference speaker worldwide.

Radical with David Platt will be 24 minutes in length and feature his teaching from The Church at Brook Hills and various conferences. The program will begin airing on stations owned and operated by Moody Radio and select affiliates during the spring of 2014.

„My prayer for this partnership with Moody Radio is that God might be pleased to use this medium for the mobilization of more and more people to make more and more disciples in more and more nations so that he might receive more and more glory that is due His name,” Platt said.

Additional information about Moody Radio’s Radical with David Platt will be released in February.

About Moody Radio: As one of the largest Christian radio networks in the country, Moody Radio has 36 owned and operated stations, six Internet stations and more than 1,500 outlets that carry all or part of its programming. For more information about Moody Radio, visit http://www.moodyradio.org.

Press release from http://beta.moodyministries.net

Cântări de Nicolae Moldoveanu interpretate de Corul şi Orchestra EVANGHELIC

CD-ul poate fi achizitionat la un pret de 15 ron, de la fr. Schinteie Ghita: 0723205273, gapschinteie@yahoo.com. Anuntul via http://www.baptist-tm.ro/cantari-de-nicolae-moldoveanu/

Blogosfera Evanghelică

Vizite unicate din Martie 6,2011

free counters

Va multumim ca ne-ati vizitat azi!


România – LIVE webcams de la orase mari