OMAGIU ADUS ORGANIZATIEI NORVEGIENE BARNEVERNET

Utu

Ca fiecare roman, indiferent de locul unde se afla, urmaresc cu inima plina de tristete tot ceea ce se intampla in dreptul familiei de crestini Marius si Ruth Bodnariu si cei cinci copii.

Cu toate ca tristetea e asa de mare, incat nu poate fi cantarita de nimeni, noi crestinii avem increderea ca Dumnezeu vegheaza asupra acestui eveniment si ca El o sa aiba ultimul cuvant, pe care noi il numim “VICTORIE”.

A venit vremea ca o lume intreaga sa poata vedea ce inseamna unitatea urmasilor lui Hristos. Astazi, o lume intreaga este martora la acest eveniment in care crestinii de pretutindeni s-au trezit precum un urias si au iesit la razboi in Numele lui Dumnezeu, impotriva fortelor iadului, manifestat prin Institutia Barneveret.

In aceste zile ne aratam cu adevarat dragostea pe care o avem unii fata de altii. Suntem impreuna in rugaciune si in post, dar in acelasi timp protestam cu toata vehementa impotriva unui sistem diabolic, care a dovedit de-a lungul anilor ca metodele lor sunt inspirate din sursele celui rau care nu conduc societatea umana spre culmi, ci spre un dezastru tot mai urias pe zi ce trece.

Protestul din Arad, in care fanfara era in fruntea miilor de oameni (barbati, femei, copii sau chiar batrani), mi-a adus aminte de evenimentele triste cand conduceam pe ultimul drum pe cineva drag. Era un ultim omagiu in care, si cei ce conduceau masinile in ambele sensuri isi aprideau luminile ca semn de ultim omagiu pentru cel ce pleca spre groapa. Vreau sa cred cu toata inima ca acest protest din Arad, cu fanfara in frunte, a fost un eveniment de victorie pentru familia Bodnariu si in acelas timp un omagiu de a conduce pe ultimul drum aceasta institutie diabolica Barnevernet…..

CITESTE mai MULT aici – http://misiuneagenesis.org/omagiu-adus-organizatiei-norvegiene-barnevernet/

10 comentarii (+add yours?)

  1. tatianasiza
    ian. 19, 2016 @ 15:00:44

    Reblogged this on newlife.

  2. ivanovicisorin
    ian. 19, 2016 @ 18:57:20

    Cititi va rog ce scrie un norvegian,unui nating de roman,[care este de partea Barnevernet ]….poate limpezeste mai mult lucrurile; Raymond Skorstad
    Raymond Skorstad
    2016-01-14 20:32:43
    I feel sorry when someone like Iulian Bulai, which have no primary knowledge of how barnevernet work, tries to legitimize the terror that happens behind closed doors in barnevernet, not in view of the public.How can you, Iulian Bulai, write about something you have no clue about? You have not been personally involved in a case of barnevernet, and therefore you have no clue whatsoever on what is going on. Only people that have first hand knowledge of barnevernet can to a certain extend, depending on how much the involvement uncovered of the „real” actions of barnevernet.Some negative actions have made it to the media. There was a series of programs on NRK, the national TV in Norway „Brennpunkt” which uncovered bad practices involving the psychologists that barnevernet use. They almost always give statements that help barnevernet and you can wonder why. They pay them very good salary for the job. About 150 000 kr for a weeks job. That’s around $19 000. No wonder they write in favor of barnevernet, else they would get more such assignments… There is plenty more to tell. Read more on http://www.barnevern.org option to translate in the left

  3. Anthony Ianosel, L.C.
    ian. 19, 2016 @ 19:47:43

    Atentie…cazul celor 5 copii in detentie ilegala a barvernetului este in pericol de-a fi afectat de doctrina „res judicata”….(aceasta este o teorie oculta care cand se „asterne” peste un caz de astfel de profil, nu se mai poate face nimic, numai procurorul General sau Regele (Seful) tarii)! Exista mai multe doctrine oculte care se folosesc ca un mod de „trisare” si „sabotare” in cazuri de profil ca acesta.
    Cuvintele „res judicata” inseamna „ca si cand a fost judecat” sau „care a fost judecat” (adjudged). Foarte periculoasa doctrina! Si aici, la aceasta conjunctura, este cazul Bodnariu [daca in caz ca noi care urmarim indeaproape cazul nu stim ca s-a facut un demers (sau atac al deciziei de jos) la un „supervisory” tribunal)]. Daca s-a atacat decizia la un „supervisory court”–atunci doctrina „res judecata” nu s-a „asternut” peste caz. Mai sunt sanse…si pt. alte proceduri scrise mai jos.
    Dar ce este acel anunt al odiosului barvernet care zice ca in urmatoarea luna ei vor demareaza procedurile de „infiere” a copiilor cu alte familii din Norvegia si posibil in tarile vecine? Este posibil ca odiosul barvernet deja are in plan sa execute o astfel de procedura draconica? Ca sa se „razbune” pe parintii copiilor pt. considerente religioase?
    1. Acum, cat mai curand, daca regele nu este solicitat personal, prin audienta, de un sef de Stat, prieten al lui–din motive umanitare pt. cauza paritilor–situatia se va complica si agrava.
    2. Spre exemplu, Printul Charles, sau chiar mama lui, poate fi contactati personal Printul Charles are mare respect si admiratie pt. Romania! L-am vazut eu de mai multe ori advocand pt. Romania, chiar in Amb. Romaniei din Washington, D.C.
    La Curtea regala a regelui Norvegiei ar trebui sa fie cineva pe linga Rege care se cunoaste bine cu Printul Charles!
    3. O alta cale posibila ar fi Papa de la Roma, sa contacteze pe Madam Prim Ministrul Norvegiei, si sa-i propuna „eliberarea copiilor pe considerente umanitare” in custodia unchiul lor Daniel Bodnariu sau a rudelor din America–proces care ar avea in vedere si o cerere de azil politic al parintilor celor 5 copii tinuti ilegal in „detentia” barvenetului. Parintii sa aplice pt. azil politic la Amb. SUA in Oslo sau in Suedia ori Olanda.
    4. O alta posibilitate de suces ar fi, ca un grup de avocati Romani din Guvern sa scrie cateva „plangeri” (complaints) impotriva barvernetului si sa le registreze cu Biroul Sefului Curtii Supremeal Norvegiei (pt a investiga barvernetul)–aceasta procedura ar afecta drastic doctrina oculta „res judicata” (in caz ca nu este in prezent un proces de atac al deciziei finale deasupra barvenetului).
    Cei care se ocupa in de-aproape de cazul Bodnariu, si citesc despre aceste patru sugestii de mai sus, ar trebui sa le discute cu acele persoane care ar fi in pozitie de a executa macar unul, pt. moment, din cele 4 sugestii mentionate.

    May God give increased discernment to all those persons who are in a position to execute meaningful proceedings which will „cause” Norway’s totalitarian regime to SET FREE the five (little) „persons” who BELONG IN THE BODNARIU FAMILY–not in detention premises controlled and machinated by odious barvernet..

  4. Anthony Ianosel, L.C.
    ian. 20, 2016 @ 01:17:36

    ALL HUMAN BEINGS ARE BORN FREE AND EQUAL IN DIGNITY AND RIGHTS…
    THEY ARE ENDOWED WITH REASON AND CONSCIENCE AND SHOULD ACT TOWARDS ONE ANOTHER IN A SPIRIT OF BROTHERHOOD…

    http://libertyandhumanity.com/themes/international-human-rights-law/the-universal-declarations-bias-towards-western-democracies/

    http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html

  5. Anthony Ianosel, L.C.
    ian. 20, 2016 @ 02:42:41

    CHILDREN ARE NOT PROPERTY OF THE STATE–THEY ARE PERSONS AS REFERRED TO IN NORWAY CONSTITUTION WITH THE SAME RIGHTS AS A MATURE PERSON; PARENTS HAVE A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO GOVERN THEMSELVES–NOT ROBBED BY THE STATE OF THIS CARDINAL RIGHT OR INVADED THEIR LIBERTY GUARANTEED BY CONSTITUTION, INTERNATIONAL COVENANTS, THE TREATIES, AND THE DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

    It is an awful shame and disgrace that all of these modern democracies’ so called „child services” use slavery language, jargon, and ideologies which still treat the little „human persons” as „property”-the same way primitive State treated them to the benefit of reprehensible slave owner!
    Today, in 2016, the modern governments, although conscientious of their national Constitution, continue to ignore this aspect to the smallest detail, namely to the definition of „person”. Constitution of Norway uses the word „person” to refer to „natural persons” who cannot be arrested or detained without due process…
    All modern Constitutions refer to a „natural person”, as „person”–not „property” that could be subjected to „snatching away” as criminal offenders are!
    The life-animated „persons” whether are smaller size or bigger size are not subject to „arrest” and „detention” by the nation’s police or military equivalent, without due process of law–in violation of national Constitution, and neither governments may employ oppressive and primitive methods of arresting and detaining smaller size persons (we call children) who BELONG IN A BIGGER SIZE PERSONS’ FAMILY and its private house! Not even animals kingdom would behave or act in such a preposterous way! No big elephant would snatch away a small size baby lion and bring it in its territory to raise him up with his baby elephants!
    If one looks closely at Norway’s Constitution, Articles 99 and 102 make clear this point. After all, it is none of the governments’ business to ROB A FAMILY OF ITS FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOM TO GOVERN THEMSELVES in a civilized society!
    The new devil in the details of these modern „child services” rackets is that these have become socialist paratroopers and hellbent totalitarian organizations which are grossly interfering in the sanctity of matrimonial, private home, and invade it with impunity, thus causing many problems to these parents, and inflicting on them irreversible psychological harm.
    These profiteering rackets reveal their brutality and ugly evil by teaming up with state cops who willfully participate in the snatching, arresting, and detaining of these little human persons, who are then driving them far away from their natural families and its sanctuary.
    The Norway Constitution prohibits such a heinous social practices concocted by legislative fiat against little human persons, who also have the right to benefit–like any bigger persons, equally –from State Constitution that binds all governmental agencies to its supreme mandates.
    Yes, there are cases of neglect and abuse in our modern society, to be sure, driven by poverty and indigency which need to be dealt with fairly and mercifully by the State which has assumed the „parens patria” (parent of the country) role for the unfortunate little children, but this “parent” may not exceed its iron wings of power over the natural sanctuary of families who are equipped with talent and knowledge to raise their little persons to adulthood.
    To be sure, the little human persons ARE NOT STATE PROPERTY as in the era of compulsory state slavery of 1600! The little persons raise and develop far better in the parental ambiance– even if it is a little bit poor. Not all the families can afford things like the wealthy do in order to „please” their children. Beethoven, Strauss and other great persons of Europe’s Renaissance era were poor and lived within their economic means–and what a grandiose and amazing music they have composed for humanity!
    Surely, there are many examples of children living in an unfavorable economic environment in every country, who have attained the status of mega millionaires and even billionaires!
    The little children persons, therefore must of necessity belong in their own natural parental sanctuary in which they were born, raised, and thought how to walk, and how to speak their natural tongue. The barvernet of modern democracies is rife with injustice, with outrageous abuses, and with painful activities that violate all democratic precepts, and notions of human decency, mercy, and human rights!
    *************************************
    ALL HUMAN BEINGS ARE BORN FREE AND EQUAL IN DIGNITY AND RIGHTS…
    THEY ARE ENDOWED WITH REASON AND CONSCIENCE AND SHOULD ACT TOWARDS ONE ANOTHER IN A SPIRIT OF BROTHERHOOD…

    Check out the following links….you will grasp the evil doings of barvernet…

    http://libertyandhumanity.com/themes/international-human-rights-law/the-universal-declarations-bias-towards-western-democracies/

    http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html

    http://stanislavs.org/child-kidnapping-by-the-norwegian-state/

  6. Anthony Ianosel, L.C.
    ian. 20, 2016 @ 02:43:15

    CHILDREN ARE NOT PROPERTY OF THE STATE–THEY ARE PERSONS AS REFERRED TO IN NORWAY CONSTITUTION WITH THE SAME RIGHTS AS A MATURE PERSON; PARENTS HAVE A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO GOVERN THEMSELVES–NOT ROBBED BY THE STATE OF THIS CARDINAL RIGHT OR INVADED THEIR LIBERTY GUARANTEED BY CONSTITUTION, INTERNATIONAL COVENANTS, THE TREATIES, AND THE DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

    It is an awful shame and disgrace that all of these modern democracies’ so called „child services” use slavery language, jargon, and ideologies which still treat the little „human persons” as „property”-the same way primitive State treated them to the benefit of reprehensible slave owner!
    Today, in 2016, the modern governments, although conscientious of their national Constitution, continue to ignore this aspect to the smallest detail, namely to the definition of „person”. Constitution of Norway uses the word „person” to refer to „natural persons” who cannot be arrested or detained without due process…
    All modern Constitutions refer to a „natural person”, as „person”–not „property” that could be subjected to „snatching away” as criminal offenders are!
    The life-animated „persons” whether are smaller size or bigger size are not subject to „arrest” and „detention” by the nation’s police or military equivalent, without due process of law–in violation of national Constitution, and neither governments may employ oppressive and primitive methods of arresting and detaining smaller size persons (we call children) who BELONG IN A BIGGER SIZE PERSONS’ FAMILY and its private house! Not even animals kingdom would behave or act in such a preposterous way! No big elephant would snatch away a small size baby lion and bring it in its territory to raise him up with his baby elephants!
    If one looks closely at Norway’s Constitution, Articles 99 and 102 make clear this point. After all, it is none of the governments’ business to ROB A FAMILY OF ITS FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOM TO GOVERN THEMSELVES in a civilized society!
    The new devil in the details of these modern „child services” rackets is that these have become socialist paratroopers and hellbent totalitarian organizations which are grossly interfering in the sanctity of matrimonial, private home, and invade it with impunity, thus causing many problems to these parents, and inflicting on them irreversible psychological harm.
    These profiteering rackets reveal their brutality and ugly evil by teaming up with state cops who willfully participate in the snatching, arresting, and detaining of these little human persons, who are then driving them far away from their natural families and its sanctuary.
    The Norway Constitution prohibits such a heinous social practices concocted by legislative fiat against little human persons, who also have the right to benefit–like any bigger persons, equally –from State Constitution that binds all governmental agencies to its supreme mandates.
    Yes, there are cases of neglect and abuse in our modern society, to be sure, driven by poverty and indigency which need to be dealt with fairly and mercifully by the State which has assumed the „parens patria” (parent of the country) role for the unfortunate little children, but this “parent” may not exceed its iron wings of power over the natural sanctuary of families who are equipped with talent and knowledge to raise their little persons to adulthood.
    To be sure, the little human persons ARE NOT STATE PROPERTY as in the era of compulsory state slavery of 1600! The little persons raise and develop far better in the parental ambiance– even if it is a little bit poor. Not all the families can afford things like the wealthy do in order to „please” their children. Beethoven, Strauss and other great persons of Europe’s Renaissance era were poor and lived within their economic means–and what a grandiose and amazing music they have composed for humanity!
    Surely, there are many examples of children living in an unfavorable economic environment in every country, who have attained the status of mega millionaires and even billionaires!
    The little children persons, therefore must of necessity belong in their own natural parental sanctuary in which they were born, raised, and thought how to walk, and how to speak their natural tongue. The barvernet of modern democracies is rife with injustice, with outrageous abuses, and with painful activities that violate all democratic precepts, and notions of human decency, mercy, and human rights!
    *************************************
    ALL HUMAN BEINGS ARE BORN FREE AND EQUAL IN DIGNITY AND RIGHTS…
    THEY ARE ENDOWED WITH REASON AND CONSCIENCE AND SHOULD ACT TOWARDS ONE ANOTHER IN A SPIRIT OF BROTHERHOOD…

    Check out the following links….you will grasp the evil doings of barvernet…

    http://libertyandhumanity.com/themes/international-human-rights-law/the-universal-declarations-bias-towards-western-democracies/

    http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html

    http://stanislavs.org/child-kidnapping-by

  7. Lavinia D.
    ian. 20, 2016 @ 10:10:51

    Am citit socata titlul: „Omagiu adus organizatiei norvegiene Barnevernet”. Draga domnule X, cel care ai scris articolul, dar si cel care l-ai postat pe acest blog,iti aduc la cunostinta ceea ce scrie dictionarul explicativ al limbii romane, in dreptul cuvantului „omagiu”: „manifestare prin cuvinte sau gesturi, a respectului, admiratiei sau recunostintei fata de cineva, ofranda, prinos”. Asadar, domnule draga, dvs. aduceti un prinos de recunostinta acestei organizatii sau o critica? Fiti, va rog mai atent cu folosirea limbii romane, ca s-ar putea sa transmiteti un mesaj denaturat. Dealtfel, am tot respectul pentru acest blog.

  8. Lavinia D.
    ian. 20, 2016 @ 10:33:15

    Am citit socata titlul acestui articol: „Omagiu adus organizatiei norvegiene Barnevernet”. Va aduc la cunostinta ce scrie dictionarul explicativ al limbii romane in dreptul cuvantului „omagiu”: „manifestare prin cuvinte sau gesturi, a respectului, admiratiei sau recunostintei fata de cineva, ofranda, prinos”. Drept urmare, domnule draga, dvs. ati adus un prinos de recunostinta acestei organizatii sau ati criticat actiunile ei? Fiti mai atent cu limba romana ca s-ar putea sa transmiteti altceva decat ati dori sa transmiteti.

  9. Anthony Ianosel, L.C.
    ian. 20, 2016 @ 12:40:04

    OMAGIU TO SUCH A REPREHENSIBLE ORGANIZATION???? Look the dramatic arrest and snitching away of a little person (infant) from her mother!!! Have strong heart. https://popaspentrusuflet.wordpress.com/2015/11/19/marius-ruth-bodnariu-a-christian-family-persecuted-in-norway-the-english-version/

  10. Anthony Ianosel, L.C.
    ian. 20, 2016 @ 12:40:35

Blogosfera Evanghelică

Vizite unicate din Martie 6,2011

free counters

Va multumim ca ne-ati vizitat azi!


România – LIVE webcams de la orase mari

%d blogeri au apreciat: